More on Richard Dawkins and Dogs

I posted several times about Richard Dawkins' erroneous use of dog variations in an attempt to refute Michael Behe (here and here and here). Denyse O'Leary has added some comments from readers with additional analysis:

Darwinism predicts that there are no taxonomic limits to variation. However, every breeding experiment of the last 100 years that attempts to see how far variation can go (E. coli, drosophila, etc.) always encounters limits beyond which further change is not possible. Thus, the fundamental prediction of Darwinian theory has been consistently falsified in a century’s worth of experimental testing.

This might be overkill if it were not for Dawkins' condescending tone in his review.