"A self-styled form of Darwinian fundamentalism has risen to some prominence in a variety of fields, from the English biological heartland of John Maynard Smith to the uncompromising ideology (albeit in graceful prose) of his compatriot Richard Dawkins, to the equally narrow and more ponderous writing of the American philosopher Daniel Dennett . . . . - Stephen Jay Gould, "Darwinian Fundamentalism," The New York Review of Books.
I am pleased to see that Krauze at Telic Thoughts has cited my earlier post and discussed the article by Donald A. Yerxa, a history professor, on the history of the intelligent design movement. Krauze's post led to a flurry of comments. I plan to have some additional comments soon.
posted by Lawrence Selden @ 1:31 PM
1 comments
I am a macroevolution agnostic. I used to accept evolutionary theory. Then I looked at the evidence. It became clear to me that macroevolutionary theory is built more on a priori philosophical assumptions than on evidence. Microevolution, on the other hand, is supported by the evidence. The distinction between the two is critical and is largely ignored, or not understood, by the mainstream media and general public.
1 Comments:
Please enable your RSS feeds!
See here:
How do I change my site feed settings?
http://help.blogger.com/bin/answer.py?answer=42662&query=feed&topic=&type=f
Post a Comment
<< Home