Barbara Forrest and Weekend Humor
If you are looking for this post, it is now here, with a new title.
posted by Lawrence Selden @ 10:53 AM
0 comments
Darwinian Fundamentalism
"A self-styled form of Darwinian fundamentalism has risen to some prominence in a variety of fields, from the English biological heartland of John Maynard Smith to the uncompromising ideology (albeit in graceful prose) of his compatriot Richard Dawkins, to the equally narrow and more ponderous writing of the American philosopher Daniel Dennett . . . . - Stephen Jay Gould, "Darwinian Fundamentalism," The New York Review of Books.
Saturday, October 01, 2005
About Me
- Name: Lawrence Selden
I am a macroevolution agnostic. I used to accept evolutionary theory. Then I looked at the evidence. It became clear to me that macroevolutionary theory is built more on a priori philosophical assumptions than on evidence. Microevolution, on the other hand, is supported by the evidence. The distinction between the two is critical and is largely ignored, or not understood, by the mainstream media and general public.
Previous Posts
- Response to Wiesel 38
- Kitzmiller: Pennock Direct and Comments
- Miller's Explanation . . . Sort Of
- Science? Religion? Philosophy?
- Speaking of Selective Reporting . . .
- The Harm, the Confusion, the Hard Choices
- Unintelligent Catholic Creator?
- Kitzmiller Update 1
- Scrappleface Strikes Again
- Kitzmiller: You Be the Judge
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home