"A self-styled form of Darwinian fundamentalism has risen to some prominence in a variety of fields, from the English biological heartland of John Maynard Smith to the uncompromising ideology (albeit in graceful prose) of his compatriot Richard Dawkins, to the equally narrow and more ponderous writing of the American philosopher Daniel Dennett . . . . - Stephen Jay Gould, "Darwinian Fundamentalism," The New York Review of Books.
As noted in previous posts, certain parts of the Judge Jones opinion made me laugh because of the glaring logical flaws. Scrappleface always makes me laugh. I think a funnier post is linked to here, since Judge Jones is artificially propping up Darwinism and giving it "protection from competing species and intellectual predators."
posted by Lawrence Selden @ 7:06 AM
1 comments
I am a macroevolution agnostic. I used to accept evolutionary theory. Then I looked at the evidence. It became clear to me that macroevolutionary theory is built more on a priori philosophical assumptions than on evidence. Microevolution, on the other hand, is supported by the evidence. The distinction between the two is critical and is largely ignored, or not understood, by the mainstream media and general public.
1 Comments:
I'm sorry but censorship worked very well for the communists and the nazis.
Post a Comment
<< Home