"A self-styled form of Darwinian fundamentalism has risen to some prominence in a variety of fields, from the English biological heartland of John Maynard Smith to the uncompromising ideology (albeit in graceful prose) of his compatriot Richard Dawkins, to the equally narrow and more ponderous writing of the American philosopher Daniel Dennett . . . . - Stephen Jay Gould, "Darwinian Fundamentalism," The New York Review of Books.
Well maybe this entire post isn't that funny, but many parts are. Reading the comments is essential with this one. Perhaps it's just me, and the fact that I find Richard Dawkins so amusing almost any time he says anything. Sometimes it seems that he is actually trying to parody himself.
posted by Lawrence Selden @ 9:52 AM
0 comments
I am a macroevolution agnostic. I used to accept evolutionary theory. Then I looked at the evidence. It became clear to me that macroevolutionary theory is built more on a priori philosophical assumptions than on evidence. Microevolution, on the other hand, is supported by the evidence. The distinction between the two is critical and is largely ignored, or not understood, by the mainstream media and general public.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home